Prevention Of Impaired Driving Discussion

August 15, 2021

The public health topic to be used for the Public Health Policy Analysis is

Prevention of impaired driving
You must choose one particular state and develop your Policy Analysis on this topic (as described and illustrated in Chapter 14 of the course textbook) for a client of your choice at the state level.

I only have a few final words of advice on the final project:

Use the document in Doc Sharing entitled “FINAL PROJECT: Policy Analysis Outline and Guidance” as a framework for your paper.

Be sure your paper has five sections that correspond to the five essential components of a policy analysis as described in the course resources. You would be wise to use the names of those components as your five subheadings. For clear descriptions and examples of how to fully and properly develop each of the five components, Chapter 14 of the Teitelbaum and Wilensky textbook is the essential resource.

Be sure your paper is compliant with APA formatting requirements. (NOTE: there is no need for your paper to have an Abstract or a Running Head.)

Be concise. Quantity is not quality; project should be no more than 15 double spaced pages. Irrelevant material will not earn you credit. And I will return papers that are not double spaced.

Very carefully review the rubric and be sure you meet all of the requirements outlined there.

Submit your project on time. There will be no extensions granted (except for appropriately documented emergencies.)

Week 10: Public Health Preparedness Policy

https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/USW1/201910_27/MS_PUBH/PUBH_6127_WC/USW1_PUBH_6127_week10.html?course_uid=USW1.68.201910&service_url=https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/wslinks&b2Uri=https%3A%2F%2Fclass.waldenu.edu%2Fwebapps%2Fbbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN

Here is the link to the textbook just copy and paste

Chapter14: http://ebook-navigate2.jblearning.com/Openpage/FlexReader/FlexReader.aspx?bookId=1200&startPageId=page299&b

Distinguished

(100%)

Proficient

(85%)

Basic

(70%)

Below Expectations

(50%)

Non-Performance

(0%)

Thesis Statement

Raises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.

The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Counter Argument

Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.

The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Conclusion

– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.

Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.

Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.

The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.