Order Public Administration Review Discussion

Order Public Administration Review Discussion

Page One Article Title: List the article publication information using APA style for reference list citations, “e.g. Smith, N (2005). Information technology in the public sector. Technology and Public Administration Journal, 12(3), 125-136.”

Page Two Summary (must be at least 100 words): List the article’s thesis (or hypotheses), methodology and evidence, its logic or argument, and summarizes its conclusions.

Please check grammar will be placed in TURNITIN

Must follow this grading criteria

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome RESPONSIVENESS (Did the student respond adequately to the paper or writing assignment?)

Responds to assigned or selected topic; Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., ideas contribute a new dimension to what we know about the topic, unearths something unanticipated); Is substantive and evidence-based; Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the assignment answer/paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and Is submitted by the due date.

CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (Does the content in the paper or writing assignment demonstrate an understanding of the important knowledge the paper/assignment is intended to demonstrate?)

In-depth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations or analyses; accurate and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, and conclusions), showing that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented and makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects to them to other ideas; Rich and relevant examples; Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, original thinking, new perspectives; Original and critical thinking; and Mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course.

Order Public Administration Review Discussion

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome QUALITY OF WRITING

Uses language that is clear, concise, and appropriate; Has few if any errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; Is extremely well organized, logical, and clear and never confuses the reader; Uses a preponderance of original language and uses direct quotes only when necessary and/or appropriate; and Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome RESEARCH, SCHOLARSHIP, AND PROFESSIONAL STYLE

Significantly contributes to the knowledge in the field; Is well supported by current and pertinent research/evidence (within the previous 5 years, except for seminal, original research where appropriate) from a variety of primarily primary, peer-reviewed sources (rather than textbooks and Web sites); and Consistently uses correct APA form and style (including citations, references, nonbiased language, clear organization, good editorial style, etc.) with very few or no errors.

Analyze and develop planning strategies in response to homeland security issues including public relations, terrorism and emergency management

Employ a series of strategies, including quality assurance, and critical thinking to manage activities ranging from normal to special assignments.

Module Three Research Assignment